A lesson from Lincoln by George Wolfe

A lesson from Lincoln
by George Wolfe

George Wolfe

George Wolfe

The Republican Party often refers to itself as the “party of Lincoln.” Today’s Tea Party conservatives within the “party of Lincoln” however, have become little more than obstructionists. Their recent battle cry, insisting they want “principles, not compromise,” is counter productive to the Republicans achieving success. They should revisit history to learn from our 16th president.

Abraham Lincoln was a man of principle, but he was also highly pragmatic. In his letter to Albert E. Hodges, Lincoln wrote, “If slavery isn’t wrong, nothing’s wrong.” Clearly, ending slavery was an objective Lincoln hoped to achieve. Yet, as an elected politician, Lincoln realized he had to deal with the political realities of the time to be successful as President.

Take, for example, his assertion that the war was justified “to preserve the union.” Publicly and politically, the preservation of the union, not the issue of slavery, became Lincoln’s foremost reason for advancing his policies. This is clearly evident in his letter responding to Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune, dated August 22, 1862. In it Lincoln emphatically states, “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery.”

Had he publically justified the war to bring an end to slavery, he would have risked losing the border states of Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware where there were many slaveholders and where the populous was divided as to which side to support (West Virginia didn’t become a Border States until 1863 when it broke ties with Virginia). Had Lincoln lost the Border States to secession, he would have had little chance of succeeding.

Lincoln similarly acknowledged political realities when he issued his Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.  It was a proclamation, not an act of congress, and he issued it only after the Union achieved a major victory in the Battle of Antietam.

While it boldly gave hope to all who opposed slavery or who were enslaved, it only claimed to free slaves in the states hostile to the union. In so stating, Lincoln was asserting power over the Confederate States, a power that he really did not have, since those states did not consider themselves under his jurisdiction. And the Border States were exempt from his proclamation since they never seceded.

The pragmatic Lincoln shrewdly set aside his principles to operate within the political realities of his day, believing that in the end, his political and military success would provide him the opportunity to impose his principled position.  Had he publicly led with the moral agenda to end slavery, he could very well have lost his battles, both politically and militarily.

Lawmakers in today’s Republican Party, the “party of Lincoln,” should cease being obstructionists. They should rather take a lesson in politics and governing from the president whose name they like to invoke.

—————————-

George Wolfe is Professor Emeritus at Ball State University and former Director and Coordinator of Outreach Programs for the Ball State University Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. He also chairs the Muncie Interfaith Fellowship, is a trained mediator, and is the author of The Spiritual Power of Nonviolence: Interfaith Understanding for a Future Without War.

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on A lesson from Lincoln by George Wolfe

Tap into the Power of Meditation by George Wolfe

Tap into the Power of Meditation
by George Wolfe

George Wolfe

George Wolfe

Last January I was invited to speak about meditation to a stress management class at Ball State University. I began by explaining the health and wellness benefits of meditation which, since the 1970’s, have been well documented in scientific journals. I then led the class through a 10-minute meditation so the students could experience the mental and physical relaxation that occurs during the practice.

One of the students came up after class to show me an application she had on her I-phone that was synced to a wristband she was wearing. Unbeknownst to me and the course instructor, she had been using this application to monitor her heartbeat during a previous aerobic exercise class, and had left the device on during our stress management class. The I-phone data screen helped to verify the scientific studies I had explained earlier. We were able to compare her heart rate during her aerobic exercise class with her resting heart rate while sitting listening to my lecture, and then also while meditating. The data clearly showed that her pulse had slowed during meditation as compared to her resting heart rate.

Because of the heightened awareness and the physiological changes that occur during meditation, the Indian scripture known as the Upanishads refers to meditation as “Turiya” or the fourth state of consciousness, distinctly different from the three more familiar states of waking, dreaming and deep sleep.

People who ascribe to a particular religion often use chanting or prayer as a vehicle for turning the attention inward and settling the mind into the meditative state. There are however, secular approaches to entering meditation that can be practiced by nonbelievers, many of which utilize breathing exercises.

A contemplative approach to meditation enables a person to restore the mind to its natural condition of tranquility. The silence at the depths of the mind comes to the foreground of our experience while mental activity recedes into the background and can even subside altogether. Consistent practice awakens our faculties of insight and realization. We come to appreciate, and are more receptive to, that level of the mind within which epiphanies dawn.

Buddhist master Thich Nhat Hanh refers to this as vipasyana, meaning “insight” or “looking deeply.” Christian contemplative Thomas Merton calls it “interior prayer,” a process of reflection that involves “not only the mind but also the heart, and indeed our whole being.” It is a practice that enables a person to perceive and appreciate the world on more profound levels, enriching life with deeper levels of meaning.

Through meditation we come to recognize the interdependent relationships that lie beneath the superficial realms of experience, perceptions which, unlike classical science, bestow upon us interpretative wisdom rather than offer mere facts.

Action proceeds from thought and influential thought comes from insight. We gain greater access to our insights through meditation. The deeper our meditations the more profound our insights, the more powerful our thoughts and the more influential will be our actions.

This is why simply being a good person is not good enough. If our daily actions are not rooted in deep insight, what we perceive as good is little more rule-based morality. What we perceive as virtue remains tainted with ego.  It is insight that enables one to intuitively recognize the path of action that completely fulfills the needs of the present moment.

Anyone interested in learning meditation can contact the Lifeworks Center in Muncie at 765-286-8221.

—————————-

George Wolfe is Professor Emeritus at Ball State University and former Director and Coordinator of Outreach Programs for the Ball State University Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. He also chairs the Muncie Interfaith Fellowship, is a trained mediator, and is the author of Meditations on Mystery: Science, Paradox and Contemplative Spirituality.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Tap into the Power of Meditation by George Wolfe

Let’s Not Think Like Adolescents by George Wolfe

Let’s Not Think Like Adolescents
by George Wolfe

George Wolfe

George Wolfe

Much of the rhetoric today from political candidates from both parties is rife with simplistic sound bites. This makes for good stump speeches and presents us with neat, dualistic, either-or choices, but it fails to inform the public of the many issues involved when trying to solve complex modern-day problems.

“Repeal Obama Care;” but what will you replace it with to keep uninsured people from flooding hospital emergency rooms? “Bomb the hell out of ISIS;” but how will you avoid killing civilians, particularly innocent women and children? According to Donald Trump, “There is no drought [in California]”. . . . “We’re going to solve the water problem.” Really? By redirecting water from where? And at what expense?

Bernie Saunders proposes to make attending a university tuition free, but he shows little insight into the complexities of financing higher education. Older, well-established universities can have huge endowments which enable them to offset tuition through both merit and need-based scholarships, while other smaller universities don’t share that advantage. And Saunders neglects the strategy of many schools that impose extraneous fees to support tech labs, health care facilities and activities related to athletics and student affairs. In addition, the cost of housing while attending college well exceeds tuition.

A more realistic proposal might be to start by making the first year of college tuition free to encourage people to continue their education. Once students begin their college education, they may be more likely to remain in the system and complete either a two-year or four-year degree.

If we consider the pertinent issue of illegal immigration, the phrase “Round up and deport all illegal immigrants” is an effective one-liner when used in a political debate. But it neglects the human side of the issue. Should we do this even at the expense of separating children from their families and sending people back to neighborhoods ruled by violent drug lords? And who will then perform the vital yet often menial jobs that these immigrants are wiling to accept? And how can we pay for the treatment of American drug users who buy the drugs and are actually responsible for much of the economic success and power of the drug lords? How can our trade policies help alleviate the abject poverty in Central American countries that lures people into becoming the pawns of drug lords?

The problem with simplistic rhetoric is that it imprisons the mind and inhibits our ability to problem solve in nuanced and creative ways.

William G. Perry, a noted Harvard student development theorist, categorized traditional college students (that is, ages 18 to 22), as being predominately dualistic thinkers in their freshman year. As they mature, they become more able to accept multiple viewpoints and eventually become comfortable with what he called “commitment in relativism.” According to Perry’s model, a simplistic, dualistic thought process is the immature thinking of adolescents.

As an educated populace, we must not settle for simplistic sound bites from our politicians. Rather, we should demand thoughtful answers that take into account multiple viewpoints and that above all, are truthful.

———————

George Wolfe is the Coordinator of Outreach Programs for the Ball State University Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. He also chairs the Muncie Interfaith Fellowship, is a trained mediator, and is the author of The Spiritual Power of Nonviolence: Interfaith Understanding for a Future Without War.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Let’s Not Think Like Adolescents by George Wolfe

Are we living in a Holoverse? by George Wolfe

Are we living in a Holoverse?
by George Wolfe

George Wolfe

George Wolfe

Recently I watched the You Tube video of the 17th annual Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate held at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Neil DeGrass Tyson, who is Director of the Hayden Planetarium and who served as host for the recent 13-week television series “Cosmos: a Space-time Odyssey,” moderated the event. The topic for this year’s debate was “Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?”

More and more, I see articles appearing by noted physicists investigating the possibility that the universe in which we live is some form of holographic illusion. Much of this hypothesis has immerged from research into quantum physics and the mysterious nature of black holes. And in a recent article published in The Business Insider, author Amanda Gefter quotes cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman as supporting the illusion hypothesis from the point of view of artificial intelligence and evolutionary game theory.

The physicist who first proposed using the hologram as a metaphor for understanding the universe was David Bohm, a quantum physicist who was an associate of Albert Einstein. Bohm referred to the cosmos as a “Holoverse.” Two physicists who have revived this idea, only approaching it very differently from what has been revealed through the study of black holes, are Stanford University physicist Leonard Susskind and Dutch physicist Gerald t’Hooft.

The thought behind this current “holographic principle” is the idea that black holes are actually two dimensional and that the laws of physics can be explained in a reality that is comprised of only two dimensions. Black holes may not have a third dimension of depth.  Rather, their structure or nature, as explained by science writer Bec Crew, might be more like water absorbing information, or like a basketball hoop whose net is tied up flat under the ring, but when the ball enters, it seems to disappear.

Susskind, in his book with the amusing title The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics, even suggests that the we might be living in an “inside-out black hole.”

The computer simulation model is based on the idea that, if the universe can be explained entirely through mathematics, then the universe is essentially algorithmic and can be programmed. This algorithmic model provokes us into a discussion of intelligence since we refer to algorithmic code that enables computers to “learn” and adapt to changing input (such as occurs when your “smart phone” takes an “educated guess” at correcting the word you misspelled) as exhibiting “artificial intelligence.”

In listening to this year’s Isaac Asimov debate, I was amazed at how the discussion momentarily turned theological and to the subject of consciousness. For panel member James Gates, theoretical physicist at the Univ. of Maryland, the universe is “an Extraordinary Mystery.” David Chalmers, a professor of Philosophy at New York University, even suggested that, if the universe is a simulation, the programmer might be thought of as a “naturalistic God,” that is, an intelligence that creates this simulation but leaves our ethical decisions and ultimately our destiny as a human race collectively up to us.

In addition, Dr. Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist at the City College of New York (CUNY) and co-founder of  String Field Theory (who was not on the Asimov panel), states in an article published in the Geophilosophical Association of Anthropological and Cultural Studies that “I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence.”

What fascinates me about such discussions is that these scientists, philosophers and mathematicians from schools like Harvard, MIT, and New York University do not see such topics as off limits to their disciplines. Perhaps we have at last reached the historical moment, described 2500 years ago by the Taoist Philosopher Chuang Tzu when he wrote: “Someday there will be a great awakening when we know that this is all a great dream.”

George Wolfe is Professor Emeritus at Ball State University and former Director and Coordinator of Outreach Programs for the Ball State University Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. He also chairs the Muncie Interfaith Fellowship, is a trained mediator, and is the author of Meditations on Mystery: Science, Paradox and Contemplative Spirituality.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Are we living in a Holoverse? by George Wolfe

National Day of Prayer – Is it Constitutional? by George Wolfe

National Day of Prayer – Is it Constitutional? by George Wolfe

George Wolfe

George Wolfe

In 2003, the National Day of Prayer was surrounded by controversy in Muncie, Indiana. That was the year the Chicago Tribune ran an article on April 27th featuring Unitarian Universalist minister Thomas Perchlik and his effort to make the National Day of Prayer observance an inclusive event.

A local minister had organized a National Day of Prayer observance at City Hall each year. His efforts, however, had invited exclusively Christian participants. Rev. Perchlik wanted to open up the observance to include all faiths, including secular humanists who place primary emphasis on science and reason.

A National Day of Prayer was first observed in 1775 at the second Continental Congress. In February of 1982, President Ronald Reagan rekindled the holiday by declaring May 6 of that year a day on which Americans “join with me in giving thanks to Almighty God for the blessings He has bestowed on this land. . . .”

According to Reagan’s proclamation, 30 years prior, “a Joint Resolution of the Congress requested the President to proclaim a day each year, other than a Sunday, as a National Day of Prayer, on which the people of the United States may turn to God in prayer and meditation in places of worship, in groups, and as individuals. Eight Presidents since then have annually proclaimed a Day of Prayer to the nation, resuming the tradition started by the Continental Congress.” Since then, the first Thursday in May has been traditionally set aside as the American “National Day of Prayer.”

But the question inevitably arises, “Is the National Day of Prayer Constitutional? Does it violate the separation of church and state?” The issue is akin to controversies that have surfaced regarding displaying the Ten Commandments on government property.

In June of 2004, I met with Mayor Dan Canan, explaining that I had devised a way the Ten Commandments could be displayed on government property without violating the guidelines established by the United States Supreme Court.

The display presented five of the more prominent listings of ethical teachings derived from religion and secular humanism. Along side the Ten Commandments were documents representing Hindu philosophy, the Buddhist Eight-fold Path, the Seven Humanist Principles of Unitarian Universalism, and a shortened version of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.

The reason why the Ten Commandments could be displayed on public property in this context without violating the separation of church and state is that the exhibit fulfills two requirements set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court, these being (1) that the display not favor one religion over another, and (2) that it not promote religion over humanism or non-religious viewpoints. Mayor Canan allowed my display to be exhibited in City Hall for a month after our meeting.

Taking the same approach to the National Day of Prayer can provide a means whereby open-minded people of different faiths and philosophical traditions come together in the spirit of cooperation for the good of our community and our nation. All that is necessary is that multiple wisdom traditions be represented in the expression of tributes given by humanists as well as by prominent religions leaders in our community.

My display of ethical teachings illustrated a particular way the great world religions and philosophical traditions have contributed to what I call the “collective wisdom of humanity.” It is our duty as educated world citizens to appreciate the contribution each of these traditions has made to the ethical and philosophical teachings that comprise this collective wisdom.

Rather than ridicule and belittle someone who values and has benefited from a tradition other than our own, let us join together on May 5th with open minds and hearts in an inclusive spirit. Let us broaden our understanding each other and derive deeper meaning from those great philosophers and spiritual teachers who have served as guiding lights in what otherwise appears to be a world plagued by darkness.

George Wolfe is Professor Emeritus and former director of the Ball State University Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. He also chairs the Muncie Interfaith Fellowship, is a trained mediator, and the author of The Spiritual Power of Nonviolence: Interfaith Understanding for a Future Without War.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on National Day of Prayer – Is it Constitutional? by George Wolfe

Extremism, not Islam, is the Enemy By George Wolfe

Extremism, not Islam, is the Enemy
By George Wolfe

George Wolfe

George Wolfe

On September 21, 2000, at Ball State University’s week long Chautauqua entitled “UniverCity,” renown Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel spoke to a standing room only crowd in Emens Auditorium. The Freshman Connections program at Ball State had chosen his book Night to be that year’s “freshman reader.” The primary focus of Wiesel’s lecture, which still stands out vividly in my mind, remains pertinent today: the greatest enemy that we must continually battle against is fanaticism.

Initially he was speaking of the fanaticism which gave birth to fascism and the anti-Semitism that possessed the consciousness of Nazi Germany. However, it was also evident in Wiesel’s speech that fanaticism in all its forms, whether it be political, ideological, religious, or a-religious, is humanity’s real enemy.

Today the most dangerous fanaticism we hear about is taking the form of religious extremism. But responding with comparable extremism is equally as dangerous. We should recognize that a long-term solution to our societal dilemmas must include resisting fanaticism is all its forms.

On the opposite end of the religious spectrum is atheistic extremism. While many people are quick to blame religious fanaticism for wars, they forget that it was Joseph Stalin who propagated the genocidal crimes of atheistic communism where millions were executed as “enemies of the people.” And how many killers have there been who, after committing mass murder, turn the gun on themselves out of the belief there will be nothing to hold them accountable for their actions after they die?

The various forms of extremist views, be they religious or secular, are rooted in fear and the inability to accept people who are different from ourselves. Extremist ideologies help us justify our fears. They are embraced by people who are prone to adolescent dualist thinking which proclaims that they are right and everyone else is wrong. The long-term remedy is to take an approach to education and parenting that questions absolute conclusions and recognizes the inherent limitations of competing viewpoints.

We also must come to understand the role poverty, desperation, and lack of equal opportunity play in giving rise to ideologies that create suicide bombers. At the 2015 Parliament of World Religions in Salt Lake City, it was an Islamic speaker who said that the most dangerous person in the world is someone who has nothing to live for. Out of that condition spawns the hatred and resentment toward the inequality and material excesses found in Western culture.

If we look at the areas of the world where terrorism first festered and grew, it was in countries plagued by abject poverty that were ignored by developed countries because they did not serve Western economic or strategic military interests.

The most effective weapons against terrorism are not military. Rather they are political, economic, and cultural. The way to advance our world and minimize the forces of fanaticism is through integration, fair trade, ethical globalization, interfaith understanding, and the enormous benefits of educational and cultural exchange.

George Wolfe is Professor Emeritus and former director of the Ball State University Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. He also chairs the Muncie Interfaith Fellowship, is a trained mediator, and the author of The Spiritual Power of Nonviolence: Interfaith Understanding for a Future Without War.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Extremism, not Islam, is the Enemy By George Wolfe

Readership List

As of October, 2016, the Readership list has been deactivated.

The idea was to enlist a few organizations and that would set the stage for a take-off of the project. Pretty uniformly, tho, existing organizations are stretched to their limit and cannot spend real time on a project that is neither a sure thing nor safely under the control of the organization. It is amazing that we did get a dozen or so small groups to give it a go. Truth is, though, that participation was nominal.

The software continues to improve. We now can handle communities as well as geographic levels and breakout by gender and age.  Within the next two or three months participants will be able to build bottom up networks of communities. Now, instead of this or that organization, I will be looking on a global scale for people who consider themselves part of the global interfaith network, or the global peace network and so forth, very much including the global women’s movement and the global indigenous people’s movement. But they will be participating in these communities as individuals first and only secondarily as members of local organizations.

Now, instead of local-to-global, we are going to try a global-to-local approach. In the best case we will get something going that will be useful to and taken up by the U.N.

Listed organizations agreed to read a recent Voices of Humanity – Order Out of Chaos winner at local meetings. See the recent winning messages here: March 8, 2016. We are seeking to list at least 20 local groups for each of twelve targeted global categories by the end of summer, 2016.

The targeted categories are: Climate Change * Gender Equality * Disadvantaged Minorities * Human Rights * Indigenous people * Interfaith Cooperation * Nuclear Disarmament * Peace * Refugees * UN Goals * Veterans * Youth.

Make history with Voices of Humanity! It is easy to add *your* voice at voh.intermix.org. Just sign up and add a message in the forum there. If you are a member of a local group, ask the group to let you read one of the Voices of Humanity messages at a meeting. After you have read the message, then ask if we can list your group on this page. The author of the overall top rated Voices of Humanity – Order Out of Chaos message each month may designate any group listed in this Readership List to receive USD 200 as a donation.

List as of October, 2016 – thanks to all who joined!

Collective Communication, Inc. – #gender_equality, #peace
Hope in Life Foundation – #gender_equality, #interfaith
Muncie Interfaith Fellowship – #interfaith
UNA San Francisco Women’s Committee – #gender_equality
UNA-USA Midpeninsula Chapter – #UNA, #UNgoals, #gender_equality
UNA-USA Sacramento Chapter – #UNA, #UNgoals
UNA-USA Silicon Valley Chapter – #UNA, #UNgoals
Unitarian Universalist UN Office San Francisco – #UNgoals
Unity and Diversity World Council – #peace, #interfaith, #UN goals

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Readership List

Order Out of Chaos: March 8, 2016

The Voices of Humanity project has launched with the election of four great messages.

Voice of Humanity as One & Voice of Women

Educating Young GirlsVoice of Humanity as One

Dear UN Women Executive Director Mlambo-Ngcuka,

What happens when girls are educated? Many wonderful things happen.

1. Birth control – Which results pulling herself out of poverty

2. Completes higher educationVoice of Women

3. Sets an example for her children and other family members

The real questions is how do we educate young girls in our country and the world?

———–
by Patti Rowuin


 

Voice of Men & Voice of Youth

Report from Kampala

Dear UN Women Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka,Voice of Men

Thank you for supporting Cities for CEDAW . As a young man from Kampala I believe that grassroots advocacy can help with the challenges that women and girls face. Here in Africa most people don’t believe in gender equality and so it is hard to reach our goals, but the good thing is that the International Community is spreading the word about the Sustainable Development Goals Voice of Youthonline. That flow of information has helped people understand the role of women and girls in the development of any community or country. I see positive changes in my community. The number of girls attending school is growing big, early marriages are dropping down and domestic violence is no longer on a high scale. These achievements are due to your great efforts. We should keep with the fight against gender inequality and gender based violence. Thank you

———–
by Siryebo Mwesigye


 

 Voice of Experience

Seize opportunities for Women & Girls Rights/Equality

Executive Director Mlambo-Ngcuka,

Recent decades mark a historic paradigm shift: women’s rights and gender equality Voice of Experiencebecame recognized and supported by all nations in the UN’s Charter, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, four UN Women’s World Conferences, and the MDGs.

Regrettably, progress is problematic. Complacency to seize opportunities and to fulfill aspirations and needs are intolerable.

UN Women is needed as a powerful voice and agent to galvanize greater action. As Director of UN Women, your continued strong stewardship of the mission is indispensable — to ensure equality and opportunity for women are strengthened in Post-2015 Development Goals; that women and girls benefit from security and development in their communities; that violence and trafficking are treated as criminal; and that culture and values evolve in current generations to protect the rights of billions of women and girls.

———–
by Herb Behrstock



Voice of Wisdom

There is Only One Race and That’s the Human Race

Dear UN Women Executive Director Mlambo-Ngcuka,Voice of Wisdom

If you ever have a DNA analysis, you’ll realize that we are all related. The idea of the one “human family” is not a idealized notion anymore. It is literally true. The Mahabharata makes this point at the very end. To kill anyone is to kill your own family member, your own kin. Many religions began as an effort to unite humanity. Perhaps revelations made through science and DNA will succeed where the religions have failed.

———–
by George Wolfe

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Order Out of Chaos: March 8, 2016

UN Goals as a Scaffold for Local-to-Global Organizing

Voices of Humanity has launched.   On March 8, 2016, we will send our crowd-sourced messages to Dr. Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, the Executive Director of UN Women. Please sign up to participate at voh.c4c.intermix.org.

Elevator Speech: The Voices of Humanity social media gives a collective voice to the genders and ages of humanity.  As women, men, youth, middle aged and seniors, we transcend the nations and religions. These groupings by gender and age naturally support human unity. By giving them each a collective voice, we create that foundation of trust and cooperation that we must have if we are to successfully handle our serious global problems.

Voices of Humanity will build a heartfelt sense of human unity, which makes it a great candidate as a local-to-global network facility for the Goals of the United Nations. The UN Goals in turn will give Voices of Humanity the structure it needs to be useful in a practical way.

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with 169 targets have been adopted at a United Nations Summit on September 25, 2015. The finalized text of the SDGs is only 30 pages – must reading, please! And we must not forget the other great goals of the UN: to end the scourge of war, complete and general disarmament, nuclear disarmament, human rights, global security and a fully respected system of international law. Please see the full write-up on the expected synergy between Voices of Humanity and the SDGs.

Together, the goals of the UN are a formidable platform for local-to-global organizing. Achieving them will require a huge common effort at every level. Skepticism abounds, but achieve them we must for the sake of Earth and humanity, so people everywhere will be looking for ways to connect and cooperate on the venture.  More detail here.

Please participate at voh.c4c.intermix.org.

———–

The Voices of Humanity Community will remake the way humanity sees itself, giving us an all-inclusive global consciousness that has gender equality built in. Voices of Humanity is more than technology — it is also a highly ambitious project. The idea is to empower our common humanity while respecting our differences.  Yes, we love our nations and religions and won’t give them up, but so, too, we see that we are all one human family.

Voices of Humanity is a project of Collective Communication, Inc. (CCI).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on UN Goals as a Scaffold for Local-to-Global Organizing

State of the Global Union by Peter Dumont, President of Star Alliance

 Star Alliance Logo

STAR ALLIANCE
FOUNDATION FOR ALL™

• Promoting ​​Highest Civic Ideals • Good Will Values for All to Share • ​​Since 1985 •
Educating for Essential Principles of Sustainable, Fulfilling Society • Peace & Love
P.O. Box 11125Berkeley • California 94712
www.STARALLIANCE.org
510-540-8887 


The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States

Dear President Obama:

Thank you so very much for your courageous and heartfelt leadership to improve gun laws; for the great global agreement on Climate Change recently achieved in Paris; and for the many other ways you continue to serve and strengthen our nation and world.

In furtherance to your State of the Union Address this Tuesday, and your important administrative and legislative agendas for 2016, I attach photographs from three recent policy advisory text-batches sent to NPR’s The Takeway  show, in response to their stimulating new citizen-input program.  I hope you will find these ideas, expressions, and resources useful for your address and the national agenda: particularly a proper emphasis on the first phrase of the Second Amendment, which clearly stipulates well-regulated. 

Please note that the Declaration of Highest Civic Ideals posted at www.STARALLIANCE.org (under Good Will Documents Offered for All), has been updated to the January 10th edition.  We plan to start offering this Declaration to several Bay Area city councils for initial official endorsements as a start on our global Campaign Good Will Vision.

The Rutgers Climatologist referred to in the texts is Alan Robock, PhD.  The importance of Dr. Robock’s work can hardly be exaggerated. He continues to warn of the Clear and Present Danger of a Nuclear Winter triggered by a relatively small number of actual explosions and the resulting uncontrollable fires that would burn until there is no more fuel.  Our nation should vigorously promote the goal of a Zero Nuclear Weapons future for the safety of all nations and people.

We should also show dynamic leadership for three critical upgrades toward a more fully-democratic United Nations.  The laudable goal of establishing a population-based, representative house for the world is now much more feasible thanks to the Internet.  It is no longer necessary to have all those individual human bodies from every nation meeting regularly in one global location!  Political leadership needs to catch up with our technological capacities, and you can distinguish yourself for all of history by promoting this great ideal which is newly practical.

The current General Assembly can also, rather easily all things considered: be upgraded to a true Senate of Nations where representative are elected directly by their respective peoples. This is not an outlandish goal!  On the contrary, it is an idea whose time has come.  It will be a very graceful way to start transitioning to full democracies for those countries, like Saudi Arabia, which are still under the rule of a king.  In this example, the king can stay a king and keep his pride and tradition while establishing an additional, do-able step of national and international elected representation.  Somebody on the global stage has got to start suggesting this in a big way.  Why not you, Sir?  Why not now?

Finally, there should be established a reasonable legislative override to the present, always-threatening Security Council veto.  As you know, the current veto too often creates paralysis and discouragement.  No large functioning democracy depends on 100% consensus.  Why should the Security Council, of all bodies, remain dysfunctional at a time of ongoing global threats?

The leaders of the five, historical veto-holding nations, including yourself, must stop acting helpless in this regard, if you will forgive me for being so blunt.  Because: the status quo is having the effect of discouraging the people everywhere as to the efficacy and possibility of true global democracy!

The five nations and national leaders who have the freedom and security of the grossly unequal historical power arrangement are precisely those nations therefore responsible to provide corresponding leadership necessary to generate, in this case: consensus among the exclusive power club for a meaningful upgrade.  These are the five who must work most creatively and courageously towards global democratic success.  There is no time to lose.

As you know, Article 109 of the U.N. Charter provides for convening a Charter Review Conference of the Members of the United Nations.  This is equivalent to a Global Constitutional Convention. It can be called at any time with a two-thirds vote of the General Assembly plus any nine members of the fifteen-member Security Council.  Every ten years, the Conference may be convened with a simple majority of the GA plus any seven members of the Security Council.  According to the Congressional Research Office publication written by Louisa Blanchfield, published 2009 December 15 (Page 21): A Charter review conference has never been held. It has now been 70 years.

Your bold leadership to convene such a Conference to consider meaningful upgrades to the United Nations would electrify the hopes of the masses, and particularly: of authentic democratic political activists throughout the world.  Your last year in office, President Obama, is a rare Golden Opportunity for our nation to show the evolutionary leadership required to do the right thing.  Such leadership would also, happily, be shining jewels in your legacy and also that of Secretary of State John Kerry,  U.N. Representative Samantha Power, and others who participate.  Should the conference even build momentum, much less succeed at first, your team will live forever among the Global Greats.  It is your opportunity to be first among the five veto holders to take a stand and encourage the others.  Will you let another of the current five take the lead? Please: don’t be a global lame duck!…Soar like The Eagle you are!

Forgive me for my boldness, born of service; please accept our good-will greetings and encouragements, and also convey them to our First Lady.  I look forward to meeting one or both of you in person should mutual opportunity allow perhaps later this year.

Most sincerely yours for practical unity, harmonious diversity, and all our declared STAR ALLIANCE Highest Civic Ideals,

Peter Bruce DuMont

Founding President-in-Service
STAR ALLIANCE • Since 1985
[Dba: STAR ALLIANCE • FOUNDATION FOR ALL]
Website: www.STARALLIANCE.org

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on State of the Global Union by Peter Dumont, President of Star Alliance